Dear Debbie...
Well I did get my 'cease and desist' email!!! What do ya think of my latest?
Ahoy. That photo looks like it was posed and done by a professional photographer. That means that if it was and you don't have a signed copyright waiver (or whatever they call it now) then you are using it in violation of copyright law. The only way you can own the copyright to a photo is to have taken the picture on a camera you own or have a signed waiver. So far you have presented no proof of copyright ownership.
You claim to be a conservative but you are acting like a Red Diaper Doper Baby.
You can take all the cheap shots ya want at the people I use to work with but they are one thing you will never be, professional.
This escapes me. With all that is going why, oh why, would an (alleged) 'conservative' throw such a fit over a picture when we should be working together on so many other issues?
posted by Hujonwi at 02:23
6 Comments:
If its copyright infringement, then your jolly going with it. :D
Although the 'improvements' to the picture may excuse you.
I don't think anyone could survive being below H.T. - if they weren't crushed outright, they'd surely smother.
Much better.
In the Hannity picture, she looks like a blonde Rachel Dretch from SNL. No insult to Ms. Dretch intended ...
However, she has a unique melting-candle appearance to her face that's unique and particularly hers - and it shows up in every image I've seen. I wonder if it's mold-able like silly putty(tm)?
I think she's dreamy.
You need a decent disclaimer like this one I stole from somewhere for educational purposes and put on my blog Flying Assmonkey;
FAIR USE NOTICE: This website contains some copyrighted material which in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is being distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational or criticism purposes only. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work including such use by reproduction in copies or recordings or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is NOT an infringement.
Post a Comment
<< Home